Foreign visitors to this blog who inhabit far flung places like Australia, Ireland, Canada, Tristan da Cunha, Sweden, Germany and Trumplandia (formerly the USA) may be interested to learn what has happened to the two ignorant oiks who in 2023 cut down that iconic sycamore tree near Hadrian's Wall in Northumberland. They were sentenced today - several weeks after they were found guilty of a crime that pricked the conscience of the British nation.
"O God, I could be bounded in a nut shell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams." - Hamlet Act II scene ii
15 July 2025
Sentenced
Daniel Graham (39) and Adam Carruthers (32) were both sentenced to four years and three months in jail. The judge - Mrs Justice Lambert - found them "equally culpable".
This was my original blogpost from back in October 2023 - just after I had heard the news about the cruel felling of the famous sycamore. And here I was in May of this year writing about the trial.
It seems to me that justice has been done in this case. Even though Graham and Carruthers may not serve all their allotted time behind bars, a significant chunk of their freedom has now been taken away. I doubt that they have the wherewithal to ponder upon their offensive crime with true regret - such is their ignorance.
Natural beauty is something to cherish and respect be it a mountain top, a rainbow, a swathe of heather on a moorside, a frog leaping into a pond, swallows winging in the summer air or a lone sycamore tree standing proud in the rolling Northumberland landscape.
Of course there are far worse people than Graham and Carruthers. They didn't kill anybody. They didn't fly an aeroplane into a skyscraper. They didn't detonate a rucksack bomb on a tube train. They didn't abuse a child or rob a bank. But they offended the society of which they are meant to be a part, finding inexplicable pleasure in destroying something that was so beautiful and defenceless and loved by thousands of their fellow citizens.
11 comments:
Mr Pudding welcomes all genuine comments - even those with which he disagrees. However, puerile or abusive comments from anonymous contributors will continue to be given the short shrift they deserve. Any spam comments that get through Google/Blogger defences will also be quickly deleted.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Visits
-
Last night, we lay down on sunbeds and watched Mrs Moon rise like a tangerine over The Aegean Sea. To capture the beauty of the scene fa...
-
Chavs being chavvish. Just the other day, I spotted a male "chav" down by the local Methodist church. He was wearing a Burberrry ...
-
So there I was standing in the kitchen of our son's terraced house. Something caught my eye outside in his little urban garden. It was a...
What they did was wrong and made many people sad so I'm glad they got some time to ponder their wrongdoing. You're probably right though, they're not smart enough to have any self awareness.
ReplyDeleteIt was deliberate destructive vandalism of an historical site. I would have given them a stiffer sentence for it.
ReplyDeletewhat they did was wrong but governments and developers fell thousands of important trees every day with no redress.
ReplyDeleteOnce again the small time criminal is scapegoated so the real bad guys can fly under the radar
Totally agree with Kylie's comment
ReplyDeleteI would argue that they killed a tree and who is to say that they are not sentient? They communicate with each other and help each other, which is more than some people do.
ReplyDeletebut they got what they wanted - notoriety.
ReplyDeleteSaw the news and immediately expected a post from you.
ReplyDeleteEven allowing for the likelihood that only half of the sentence will be served "inside,"* those sentences are too long by a factor of at least two. This is based on my reading of the sentencing guidelines at the time of my comment on your last post on this topic.
I feel there is a continuing classist aspect to the swingeing sentences visited on social order and outrage offences in the UK. I also thought the fellow who sabotaged the boat race a few years ago got an unduly severe punishment (in that case not classist against the offender, who was actually a bit of a trustafarian, but classist in protection of the event).
Incarcerating people is expensive and also destructive because it damages people with whom society will still have to deal on their release.
*Probation after release is also punitive.
And, luckily, from now on when you Google their names, their idiocy will come back to haunt them.
ReplyDeleteTrumplandia? YP, that really hurt. Most of the sane among us hate his guts.
ReplyDeleteTheir sentence featured on last night's main TV news, Neil! As soon as a picture of the iconic tree appeared behind the newsreader, I knew what it was about - thanks to having read about it on your blog, first in 2023 and then again in May.
ReplyDeleteLike you say, they have not killed or abused a person or committed any of the other crimes you listed, but destroying something beautiful and defenceless just because they can shows a mindset that, given the opportunity, might not stop at cutting down a tree.
Building new roads in the middle of the countryside creates roadkill every day. I could think of such a recent road build construction. Have you seen the recent photos of the felled tree? It's sprouting branches and leaves again.
ReplyDelete