I am well aware that when "Poem" is the title of one of my blogposts, viewing figures will plunge. A lot of people - though thankfully not all - have an antipathy towards poetry. But to me she is a familiar bedfellow, by my side for well over six decades.
As a teacher of English, I often had to grapple with the habitual and obstinate grumble, "I don't like poetry!" It was a prejudice that ignored the delight that most people find in song lyrics or that small children find in nursery rhymes or when people choose epitaphs. The retort also niggled me because I simply could not understand it. It seemed so sadly misguided.
There's a notion out there in the world that poetry is somehow snobbish, highfalutin and cast down from ivory towers but I think of it as a vehicle for getting to the very core of things. Every word should matter and there should be no excess. Poetry should speak truly but sometimes mysteriously too.
When I was seven years old, I was up in my bedroom writing in an exercise book. Something clicked and I made my own, original poem about a hero venturing out to do battle against the forces of evil. I wish I still had that poem but I don't.
Mum was calling my family to the tea table and I came downstairs with my exercise book. I asked them to listen to my poem and I stood in the doorway that led to the stairs then rather proudly I read that poem out aloud. And you know what? There was no applause - just an astonished pause followed immediately by hearty familial laughter.
It was not a funny poem but I guess that there is something rather funny about a seven year old boy in short trousers reciting a self-penned poem to his family. It was not the sort of thing that happened in the heart of East Yorkshire. Seven year old boys climbed trees, played football or picked caterpillars off cabbage leaves. They did not write poems about knights of yore on white horses.
And so we come to yesterday's poem - "Nileometer". It was conceived yesterday morning and quickly went through three drafts. It was finished by teatime but I didn't read it aloud to Shirley and Phoebe - fearing mirth perhaps.
Inspiration was drawn from the idea of a cruise boat passing a succession of random scenes along the Nile - just gliding by. And I thought of the Nileometer on Elephantine Island where ancient Egyptians measured water levels and it seemed that that is what my poem was doing - measuring, taking stock...

And here's something else that features in the poem. It's the pyramid-like hill that overlooks The Valley of the Kings which may be the very reason that later pharaohs chose that location for their tombs. I did not know about the hill until I went there...
To make a poem you have to have an idea for one. That seems pretty obvious. Not exactly a detailed recipe but some kind of inspiration. And when you have got your first draft down you need to look at what you have written - tweaking it, picking away at words, editing, replacing, questioning yourself. You become like a French polisher, addressing small faults, applying wax and buffing up. I don't think you are ever fully satisfied.
Yesterday, I was very pleased with myself. There was no hanging about, no prevarication. I just got on with it, riding the wave of my idea and there the poem was - done. Like a loaf of bread fresh from the oven.
So different from my currently shelved poem, "Stanage Edge". I embarked on that one in November and thought it would be helpful to take my time for once, let it ferment like wine in a barrel but I haven't gone back to it in many weeks. Maybe my changed method choice was wrong but I will return to it soon and there will be another "Poem" blogpost. Readers will no doubt scurry for shelter. After all, too much exposure to poetry could damage your health.
The contrast between Stanage Edge and the strange lunar hill in your photo
ReplyDeletewould be the subject of a poem. The tension is in the mood each evokes.
Sylvia Plath said poetry is a tyrannical discipline because the poet goes from
A to B at such an astonishing speed.
* Poetry is a tyrannical discipline. You've got to go so far, so fast,
Deletein such a small space that you've just got to burn away all the peripherals. *
Sylvia Plath (1932-1963)
And we all know what happened to Sylvia. I visited her grave in Heptonstall. See:-
Delete.https://beefgravy.blogspot.com/2018/03/uplands.html
Louise Gluck died at the age of 80 in 2023 having won the Nobel.
DeleteRuth Fainlight ( married to Alan Sillitoe ) celebrated her 95th birthday.
Anne Carson at 76 is still with us, as is Gillian Allnutt age 77.
I'm rereading Gillian's collection *Nantucket and the Angel* - wonderful !
Kathleen Jamie, who was raised near Edinburgh, is 64.
Valerie Gillies, Canadian poet who grew up in Scotland, is 78.
Gillian Clarke, Anglo-Welsh poet & essayist, is 89.
Medbh McGuckian in Ireland is 76. Sarah Maguire died in 2017.
Sylvia Plath's death in 1963 at the age of 30 is all the more terrible.
We have her books and journal which will be read forever.
I wish I could mention another 500 women poets published by
DeleteBloodaxe, Carcanet, Waterloo, Bad Betty, Happenstance, Salt, Lapwing,
Seren, Neon, Nine Arches, Verve, Dream Catcher, Peepal Tree Press etc.
not to mention Faber and The Poetry Review stocked by Waterstones.
I'm obsessed by poetry and only write plodding prose.
Do children get poetry at school ? We did at my Scottish junior school.
I read Randall Jarrell's great critical study *Poetry and the Age* at 15.
I'm rereading Laura Riding Jackson's *The Telling* and still don't
understand it. An obscurantist essay as to why she renounced poetry.
You were lucky enough to have studied under Norman MacCaig.
Glasgow had Edwin Morgan who mastered every metre and form.
I agree with everything you've said in this post about poetry and its sad, undeserved devaluation in modern life.
ReplyDeleteThese few words give me a little extra strength. Thank you Debra.
DeleteI venture to say that I must not have a poetic mind, since most poems baffle me, especially long ones; short rhymes and funny ditties from childhood are easier for me to understand, but even I know that exposure to poetry does not damage one's health. Mental health maybe, as one goes crazy trying to work out the meaning of what the poet has written. Your recent Nileometer being such a one. Having no personal knowledge of Egypt or the actual Nile-o-meter your words make little sense to me.
ReplyDeleteP.S. I went back and re-read, more slowly this time, and I like it, though my mind kept looking for the rhyme which I used to think all poems were supposed to do.
ReplyDeleteI am gratified that you gave my poem a second chance Elsie and that on your second reading you found some merit in it. I think "more slowly" is the key.. A different kind of reading.
DeleteMore slowly AND knowing what the poem is based upon.
DeleteI struggle with poetry in the same way I struggled with literature. Year 9 with Mr Hatton and all that talk of themes and metaphors, making assumptions about the intention of the writer when we couldn't actually know what was in their mind as they wrote.
ReplyDeleteAll these years on, I am capable of seeing some themes and some metaphors but that early exposure was not joyous or even revelatory and I haven't recovered.
I don't blame Mr Hatton, he taught what the syllabus required.
I do understand the horror of having your poetry laughed at. There is no recovering from being mocked after baring one's soul.
Poetry strips you naked.... but thankfully only in a metaphorical sense.
Deleteditto with literature, I simply don't see the need for the long-winded metaphors and themes that make a book 600 pages long when the story can as easily be told in 300 pages without having to decipher the unnecessary.
DeleteJust a picky question from the troublemaker in the second row: "foment"?
ReplyDeleteThank you Lord Marcellous. Error duly amended.
DeleteI wasn't mirthful after reading the poem.
ReplyDeleteWere you asleep?
DeleteI am amazed that your family laughed at their 7-year-old poet. Everything I know from your blog about your parents and your childhood made me expect to read that they encouraged you and commended you for your creative use of language.
ReplyDeleteWhen I was little, poems were rhymes. Then I found out that poetry doesn't have to rhyme at all, and at about 12, I experimented a little with that. There is one such non-rhyming poem I created in my head, sitting on the back steps leading from the kitchen into the garden on a balmy summer evening, and I still know it word for word (it is rather short, admittedly).
The way you use English, I expect that in your native tongue you are very alive to the music of language and its incisive power too.
DeletePS: What is a French polisher?
ReplyDeleteA French polisher is a highly skilled wood-finishing craftsperson who specializes in applying a traditional, glossy finish to wooden furniture and antiques. The technique—called French polishing—involves hand-rubbing hundreds of microscopic layers of shellac (a natural resin) and alcohol onto wood using a specialized cotton pad.
DeleteThank you!
DeleteI thought your poem was excellent Neil but I have a certain fear of being seen as just following a general trend in blogger land of being praiseworthy by default. And you shouldn't fish for compliments anyway;) Poetry comes from the heart, sometimes it is just the stark telling in a few words of heartache or a landscape. Yours comes from wanting to describe the world around you. So go on finish Stanage Edge, after all our blogs are our own personal journeys.
ReplyDeleteI can't write poems by the way....
I have known you long enough to expect honesty from you Thelma - not falsity.
Delete"I can't write poems by the way...." sounds like the first line of a poem.
It's interesting to read the analysis of your thought processes, and of the inspiration behind your poem. You reacted to something that moved you.
ReplyDeleteSome poets try too hard to be clever. Surely the point of any form of language is to be articulate and clear, whether that's spoken or written, fact or fiction.
A lot of people won't read a poem because they don't think they can understand it, and some poetry is a little precious that way.
ReplyDeleteMost of the poetry we experience is in the form of song lyrics, and we hear it, we don't read it. A huge part of the meaning, can be in the voice it is read in. When I read it, I struggle to find the tone, the meter, that conveys the meaning the author intended. Maybe next time, hit video record on your I-Pad and post it as spoken word.
ReplyDeleteI remember once seeing poetry described as something that lots of people write and almost no one reads. Perhaps the satisfaction that comes from creating a poem, from wrestling with the words and sounds, should be the writer's ultimate goal? Who says anyone else needs to read it?
ReplyDeletePost what you want, Neil. It's your blog.
ReplyDeletePoetry is a tough sell. I wish I would take more time to write. So keep up the poetry writing.
ReplyDeleteGlad you wrote this. I liked your poem but there was a line that I had to reread and it made me think if it was quite right.
ReplyDeleteIn your post above you said “ Every word should matter and there should be no excess”.
Have a look at verse three - would line one be better without the word “stands” - that is what made me pause and have to reread. Then I went to line 2 and wondered whether “where”:could go?.
I hope you don’t take this as negative criticism and see it as someone who is engaging with your poem.
The "stands" of papyrus as a group planting, not just where papyrus stands and it is where the brown children swim as opposed to places where they would not otherwise swim?
DeleteYP, am I getting that right?
That is how I read it but I got the same meaning without the two words
DeleteI have a similar relationship with art. I started copying the comics in newspapers then from the rich mine of UK comic books we had in the 70s. Before long I was creating my own.
ReplyDelete